Revenue Agenda
  • Investing
  • Latest News
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Latest News
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Economy
No Result
View All Result
Revenue Agenda
No Result
View All Result
Home Latest News

Babylon Bee fights for free speech all the way to the Supreme Court

by
February 19, 2024
in Latest News
0
Babylon Bee fights for free speech all the way to the Supreme Court
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

On February 28, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in two cases involving state laws in Texas and Florida that increase transparency and accountability for Big Tech companies. The laws would require social media giants to publish their user standards and then apply them fairly.  

The Babylon Bee filed a friend of the court (amicus) brief to explain to the court that, when left to their own devices, Big Tech often abuses these vague policies to silence voices that challenge its orthodoxy — too often at the expense of conservative and religious viewpoints. 

Social media titans seem to have unlimited, unilateral authority to censor, deplatform or shadow-ban disfavored users, content and viewpoints. The companies claim to be ‘content-neutral’ and ‘open platforms,’ and they reserve the right to censor content that violates their ‘community guidelines’ and rules against ‘hate’ and ‘misinformation.’ 

Examples abound: 

In 2022, Twitter suspended The Babylon Bee’s account for ‘hateful conduct’ after it named Assistant Secretary for Health Dr. Rachel Levine the site’s ‘Man of the Year.’ Twitter refused to reinstate The Bee unless it deleted the tweet, something The Bee refused to do on principle. Had Elon Musk not bought Twitter, The Bee would almost certainly still be banned. 

Humorless Facebook employees read The Bee’s satire piece during Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation hearing — titled ‘Senator Hirono Demands ACB Be Weighed Against a Duck to See If She Is a Witch.’ Facebook quickly decided the article ‘incited violence’ and refused to change its position. 

A few months ago, YouTube flagged The Bee as a ‘violent criminal organization’ because it questioned censorship (apparently failing to see the irony). YouTube removed its video ‘If the LEAKED Nashville Shooter Manifesto is legit, what does it say about censorship in the US?’ Even after appealing this mischaracterization of the video’s content, YouTube held firm. 

But this isn’t just The Bee’s problem. Far from it.  

Big-Tech-driven censorship also impacts religious Americans whose faith animates traditional views on many topics of intense political debate. Social media has repeatedly kicked organizations off their platforms for supporting traditional marriage, opposing abortion and questioning transgenderism. 

In the past few years, faith-based and pro-life organizations were deplatformed at a nearly weekly rate. 

In 2018, Facebook temporarily suspended Pastor Franklin Graham for ‘hate speech’ and ‘dehumanizing language’ because of an old comment on North Carolina’s bathroom law, where Graham said we ‘need to go back! Back to God. Back to respecting and honoring his commands.’ Facebook apologized only after immense backlash. 

In 2020, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter all censored praise and worship videos posted by Bethel Music’s Sean Feucht, claiming his videos violated ‘community guidelines.’ 

The same year, YouTube temporarily booted theologian John Piper’s audiobook, ‘Coronavirus and Christ,’ for ‘violating community guidelines.’ 

Social media has also clamped down on pro-life ads from Susan B. Anthony List, Heartbeat International, Live Action, Students for Life, and even pro-life senatorial candidates, all while allowing Planned Parenthood’s pro-abortion political ads without question. 

This egregious, one-sided censorship is why we argued in our brief that the Supreme Court should allow states to hold Big Tech to its own rules and provide fair platforms.  

The corporations respond that these state laws violate their First Amendment rights to exercise editorial judgment over content on their sites. This misses the point.  

Americans rely on social media to share their views, increasingly more than they do by any other means. Your telephone company and the post office can’t filter which messages are permissible based on their opinion of what you said. The same rules should apply online.  

Social media is the modern-day public square. Even if they are private companies, Big Tech giants should not have discretion to ideologically decide who can speak online. 

Social media has also clamped down on pro-life ads from Susan B. Anthony List, Heartbeat International, Live Action, Students for Life, and even pro-life senatorial candidates, all while allowing Planned Parenthood’s pro-abortion political ads without question. 

What’s more, the Texas and Florida laws do not infringe on these corporations’ free speech rights. The laws allow companies to create their own user standards and policies for allowed content. Instead, the laws merely require social media platforms to be accountable. If their user standards discriminate against certain views, users should know that up front. 

Censorship online should concern us all. What’s in vogue today might be banned tomorrow without adequate free-speech protections. That’s why we desire an intellectually diverse social media universe in which all Americans have an equal platform to advocate their views. The Texas and Florida laws advance these values by promoting the free exchange of ideas. They would restore trust and consumer confidence in social media.  

We hope the Supreme Court will agree. 

Jeremy Dys is special counsel for litigation and communications for First Liberty Institute, a non-profit law firm dedicated to defending religious freedom for all Americans. Read more at FirstLiberty.org. Follow him on Twitter @JeremyDys

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
Previous Post

Biden needs to learn from Carter about standing up to our adversaries

Next Post

Latest on Dollar Index: Falling Below 104.20 Today

Next Post
Latest on Dollar Index: Falling Below 104.20 Today

Latest on Dollar Index: Falling Below 104.20 Today

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Top 10 Potash Countries by Production (Updated 2024)

Top 10 Potash Countries by Production (Updated 2024)

August 21, 2024
Top 10 Phosphate Countries by Production (Updated 2024)

Top 10 Phosphate Countries by Production (Updated 2024)

August 1, 2024
Top 10 Uranium-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

Top 10 Uranium-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

November 6, 2024
7 Biggest Lithium-mining Companies in 2024

7 Biggest Lithium-mining Companies in 2024

September 18, 2024
NATO Defense Spending Pledge Puts Spotlight on Platinum Group Metals

NATO Defense Spending Pledge Puts Spotlight on Platinum Group Metals

0
New Hampshire Gov. Sununu signs $15.2B ‘miracle’ budget into law

New Hampshire Gov. Sununu signs $15.2B ‘miracle’ budget into law

0

Pennsylvania House clears tax credits for new teachers, nurses, police officers

0
Evers signs bipartisan sales tax bill aimed at sparing Milwaukee from bankruptcy

Evers signs bipartisan sales tax bill aimed at sparing Milwaukee from bankruptcy

0
NATO Defense Spending Pledge Puts Spotlight on Platinum Group Metals

NATO Defense Spending Pledge Puts Spotlight on Platinum Group Metals

August 22, 2025
Trump, Rio Tinto Push for Copper as Court Halts Arizona Mine Transfer

Trump, Rio Tinto Push for Copper as Court Halts Arizona Mine Transfer

August 22, 2025
Alice Queen

Alice Queen

August 22, 2025
Horizon Minerals

Horizon Minerals

August 22, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Trading Ideas and Latest News

Error: Contact form not found.

Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent News

NATO Defense Spending Pledge Puts Spotlight on Platinum Group Metals

NATO Defense Spending Pledge Puts Spotlight on Platinum Group Metals

August 22, 2025
Trump, Rio Tinto Push for Copper as Court Halts Arizona Mine Transfer

Trump, Rio Tinto Push for Copper as Court Halts Arizona Mine Transfer

August 22, 2025
Alice Queen

Alice Queen

August 22, 2025
Horizon Minerals

Horizon Minerals

August 22, 2025
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 revenueagenda.com | All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Investing
  • Latest News
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Economy

Copyright © 2025 revenueagenda.com | All Rights Reserved